<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tolerance and Diversity in Academia</title>
	<link>http://weshouldlive.com/blog/archives/83</link>
	<description>Ben Bateman's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: BenBateman</title>
		<link>http://weshouldlive.com/blog/archives/83#comment-46</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 06:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weshouldlive.com/blog/archives/83#comment-46</guid>
					<description>Thank you, alessandra.  For those who haven't seen it, she's referring to a long and heated discussion on this story at the Volokh Conspiracy &lt;a href=&quot;http://volokh.com/posts/1144995826.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, alessandra.  For those who haven&#8217;t seen it, she&#8217;s referring to a long and heated discussion on this story at the Volokh Conspiracy <a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1144995826.shtml" rel="nofollow">here</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: alessandra</title>
		<link>http://weshouldlive.com/blog/archives/83#comment-45</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 22:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weshouldlive.com/blog/archives/83#comment-45</guid>
					<description>Ben Bateman (mail) (www):
In this comment, Michael O'D calls Clayton Cramer's rather innocuous comments a diatribe, and then calls Clayton a bigot. Then he tries to threaten Prof. Volokh into disassociating himself from Clayton. It's attempted academic censorship in real time! 
=========================
Totally agree. It's just disgusting how pro-homosexuals are always labeling/slandering anyone who disagrees with them as a &quot;diatribe, or full of hate, or vicious posting&quot; bla bla bla, when it's blatantly clear that neither in tone nor in content is there anything even mildly &quot;harassful&quot; or even minimally close to a &quot;diatribe.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Bateman (mail) (www):<br />
In this comment, Michael O&#8217;D calls Clayton Cramer&#8217;s rather innocuous comments a diatribe, and then calls Clayton a bigot. Then he tries to threaten Prof. Volokh into disassociating himself from Clayton. It&#8217;s attempted academic censorship in real time!<br />
=========================<br />
Totally agree. It&#8217;s just disgusting how pro-homosexuals are always labeling/slandering anyone who disagrees with them as a &#8220;diatribe, or full of hate, or vicious posting&#8221; bla bla bla, when it&#8217;s blatantly clear that neither in tone nor in content is there anything even mildly &#8220;harassful&#8221; or even minimally close to a &#8220;diatribe.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
