If you live long enough and pay attention to the news long enough, these sorts of stories become routine: Series of blunders turned the plastic bag into global villain:
Scientists and environmentalists have attacked a global campaign to ban plastic bags which they say is based on flawed science and exaggerated claims.
The widely stated accusation that the bags kill 100,000 animals and a million seabirds every year are false, experts have told The Times. They pose only a minimal threat to most marine species, including seals, whales, dolphins and seabirds.
Gordon Brown announced last month that he would force supermarkets to charge for the bags, saying that they were “one of the most visible symbols of environmental waste”. Retailers and some pressure groups, including the Campaign to Protect Rural England, threw their support behind him.
But scientists, politicians and marine experts attacked the Government for joining a “bandwagon” based on poor science.
But how could this be? Only a few years ago “everyone” “knew” that plastic bags were a scourge on the planet. Now the fearmongers say, “Never mind.”
Could this have some connection to global warming? Is it conceivable that the current eco-scares will be debunked in ten years, just as the eco-scares of 10 years ago are being debunked today (and those of 20 years ago were debunked 10 years ago, and so forth)?
No, don’t believe it. Sure, the eco-scaremongers have a long track record of drumming up fake scientific consensus that is later demonstrated to be false. Sure, they’ve done it with nuclear power, alar on apples, radon in basements, the spotted owl, the vanishing rain forests, plastic bags, and many others that I could find with just a few minutes of Googling. But surely this time the eco-fanatics are right, and we should immediately make ourselves miserable with the knowledge that doing so will somehow make the future better for someone else. Maybe. Or maybe not.
(And isn’t it strange how selectively those people become concerned about future generations? I mean, these are the same people who love abortion and hate procreation. In fact, they hate humanity generally. And yet they always claim to be deeply concerned about future generations.)
I understand how youngsters can be fooled by these hoaxes. They just haven’t lived long enough to see the pattern. But I don’t understand the grown-ups. Even someone who pays minimal attention to the news ought to notice that yesterday’s panics quietly go away, while the new panics are reported with breathless excitement.
The internet may slow these hoaxes down, though. When I was a kid, the only information most people had was whatever the mainstream media fed them. Now the truth is out there, just a few clicks away. Continuing ignorance becomes steadily more difficult to justify.